<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tank Forcefield</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedigitaldiplomat.com/2006/10/16/tank-forcefield/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedigitaldiplomat.com/2006/10/16/tank-forcefield/</link>
	<description>Global security, governance, and economics in the digital era. By Justin Delabar.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rhadamanthys</title>
		<link>http://www.thedigitaldiplomat.com/2006/10/16/tank-forcefield/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhadamanthys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedigitaldiplomat.com/2006/10/16/tank-forcefield/#comment-238</guid>
		<description>This particular system was developed by RAFAEL, but it's possible the design originated in Australia. Actually, I heard that the US government is looking into developing its own version since it's either not happy with RAFAEL's, or believes it's too pricey. Most likely it has something to do with awarding large defense contracts to campaign donors here in the States.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This particular system was developed by RAFAEL, but it&#8217;s possible the design originated in Australia. Actually, I heard that the US government is looking into developing its own version since it&#8217;s either not happy with RAFAEL&#8217;s, or believes it&#8217;s too pricey. Most likely it has something to do with awarding large defense contracts to campaign donors here in the States.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g bruno</title>
		<link>http://www.thedigitaldiplomat.com/2006/10/16/tank-forcefield/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>g bruno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 06:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedigitaldiplomat.com/2006/10/16/tank-forcefield/#comment-233</guid>
		<description>Is this 'metal storm' ?
Australian invention with rounds lined up in the barrel and fired electronically.

Whatever, the system is subject to exhaustion. Comments from the IDF indicate astonishment at the 'hundreds' of RPGs that HA deployed.
That level of fire would only be possible from pre-dug hardened positions.
In open ground it might be difficult to fire 'hundreds' The Kornet has a 4km range, but HA prefer to fire from close-in to ensure hitting the Merkova's vulnerable points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this &#8216;metal storm&#8217; ?<br />
Australian invention with rounds lined up in the barrel and fired electronically.</p>
<p>Whatever, the system is subject to exhaustion. Comments from the IDF indicate astonishment at the &#8216;hundreds&#8217; of RPGs that HA deployed.<br />
That level of fire would only be possible from pre-dug hardened positions.<br />
In open ground it might be difficult to fire &#8216;hundreds&#8217; The Kornet has a 4km range, but HA prefer to fire from close-in to ensure hitting the Merkova&#8217;s vulnerable points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
