David Bosco calls for sanity amid reports that the North Korea nuclear test may not have been nearly as successful as Pyongyang would like everyone to believe:

Some reputable folks were advocating military strikes well before the test, and they may seize on the latest developments to reissue the call.

We should be wary. The fundamental strategic and moral problem with military action against North Korea is not their nuclear arsenal—it’s their ability to wreak havoc on the south through conventional weapons. In this sense, the nuclear test—successful or not—has not changed the strategic picture on the peninsula dramatically. What it has done, one hopes, is create the political unanimity required to take the steps we should have already taken: namely, enhancing scrutiny of ships leaving North Korea to prevent any leakage of their fissile material and missile technology and bolstering regional missile defenses.

Spot on, and besides putting in place needed embargo measures on North Korea the current political climate affords China the opportunity to prove itself as a rational and important international actor as I suggested the other day.

As far as military strikes being considered by reputable policymakers at this point… it’s highly doubtful, or so I would hope. If I’m wrong, the American foreign policy apparatus is completely defunct until a new administration steps in. Any form of military action aimed at destroying North Korea’s nuclear stockpiles would not wipe out the entirety of the country’s nuclear material. While aerial strikes would severely set back Pyongyang’s ability to threaten its neighbors with nuclear-tipped ballistic missiles (despite the fact that they not so much fly as go diving directly into the ocean), more than enough material would be left behind to sell for use in dirty bombs or other shady nuclear projects outside the peninsula. While North Korea may not sell nuclear materials or know-how now out of fear of a military strike, kinetic strikes now would certainly act as an impetus. An embargo, however, backed by the international community would guarantee that terrorist or other unsavory forces will not gain access to North Korea’s nuclear accoutrements.

Hypocrisy alert:

“We had urged [North Korea] to desist from introducing nuclear weapons in the Korean peninsula,” Pakistani foreign office spokeswoman Tasnim Aslam said.

“It is regrettable that [North Korea] chose to ignore the advice by the international community not to conduct the test.”

Ms Aslam has also defended Pakistan’s own nuclear record.

“Pakistan did not initiate nuclear tests in the region. We were acting purely in self-defence,” she said.

Pakistan’s claims here are almost laughable considering its own involvement in North Korea’s nuclear program. Pakistani scientist Abdul Qadeer Khan’s nuclear network provided North Korean scientists detailed nuclear information in the 1990s which undoubtedly helped speed the global community into this current crisis. While Pakistani president Pervez Musharraf assures the international community that Khan remains under house arrest, he continues to disallow IAEA officials the luxury of questioning Khan about his nuclear dealings. The excuse Musharaff hides behind is that allowing Khan to become the center of international scrutiny would lead to massive upheaval and, perhaps, the collapse of the current, arguably secular Pakistani government. A more adequate explanation may be that high ranking Pakistani officials inside the military-governmental complex may be concerned with their own implication in any information attained from Khan.

Interesting friends the US keeps, to be sure. The sad part is the current governmental configuration in Islamabad may be the least damaging one for US interests at the current time. That’s not to say that it has not caused damage, but that’s another topic for another post when I have more time/energy.

technorati tags:north-korea, japan, china, wmd, nukes, south-korea

If North Korea did actually test a nuclear device today, or perhaps even if it only claimed it did, this is a defining moment for China. Simply, North Korea will not see the United Nations as a credible deterrent as long as China continues to quietly support the regime in Pyongyang and the United States remains tied up militarily in the Middle East. Since the US is going to be embedded within Iraq well into the unforeseeable future, UN sanctions are the only enforceable option at the Security Council level currently. If wide-ranging sanctions that include both Russia and especially China are not passed within the next couple days, Kim Jung Il will be convinced that he can get away with potentially anything he desires; an unacceptable outcome with incredibly dangerous implications. Now the UN and its utopian founding notions of collective security and punishment will be tested on what should be a no-brainer Security Council resolution proposed by the United States:

The United States is suggesting international inspections of any cargo going into or out of [North Korea].

…

The U.S. draft calls for an overall arms embargo, prohibitions on any financial transactions that might support missile activities, a freeze on any assets related to North Korea’s weapons programs, measures to prevent counterfeiting by North Korea and a ban on luxury goods.

While both Russia and China are currently ambiguous on their support for or against the US draft resolution, it would not be surprising if they do vote for it. The two regional nuclear powers are not interested in letting an unpredictable state actor such as North Korea dictate East Asian security conditions by way of a looming nuclear threat. In the case of the sanctions’ passing, a naval embargo of North Korea will be required, and China’s burgeoning navy is perfect for such a role in a multinational force.

Of course, such a plan assumes that China would want to play a role in any coastal policing of the North Korean state. In all likelihood that will not be the case, as China would see its support for a US-backed sanctions resolution as concession enough. However, a paradox now presents itself for Hu Jintao and the Chinese Communist Party. If China wishes to be the benign east Asian hegemon it’s supposedly meant to be, it has to prove itself as a guarantor of regional security — yet it wishes to prop up Kim Jung Il and his regime out of a selfish fear of conflict causing instability and then harm to China and its markets. Kim, however, has guaranteed instability by putting both Japan and South Korea on the defensive. While both countries fall under the US defense blanket, one has to wonder how long Japan, which is considering re-working its pacifist constitution, will stay a non-nuclear power if North Korea keeps ramping up the stakes. China, despite calls for moderation and negotiation, has remained North Korea’s only, albeit uneasy, friend. Now that the friendship has become a hindrance to China and a change in policy is required, one that will assuage Japan and South Korea’s fears and put in place a new East Asian collective security order with China at its lead. The process can begin with a strong Chinese presence in a naval blockade of North Korea. It would send a strong message to Pyongyang that it has finally stepped over the line, something that, coming from China, would not simply be ignored as the numerous Security Council warnings have been. China, in this instance, will determine if it is truly ready to be a regional leader and a key player in the international security environment.

technorati tags:north-korea, japan, china, wmd, nukes, south-korea

North Korea has conducted an underground nuclear test, which resulted in a small quake in the area that was picked up by regional and US intelligence services. The test, which was originally expected to happen early this past Sunday, was conducted after the US denied bilateral negotiations and following a summit meeting of China and Japan’s leaders, Hu Jintao and Shinzo Abe. The US will push for UN-mandated sanctions on North Korea at a meeting of the Security Council this morning, and it is highly probable such measures will pass — no one is happy at Kim Jung Il, even his supposed ally China, which is now placed in an amazingly compromising situation.

I’ll have more later, after the day job.

Seems the US is giving the SCIRI, the most powerful Shi’ite party in Iraq, a nice little gift:

U.S. and Iraqi forces clashed with Shiite militiamen Sunday in the southern city of Diwaniyah for the second time in two months in a battle sparked by a raid on the home of a leader of the Mahdi Army, accused of killing Sunnis in Iraq’s spiral of sectarian violence.

The U.S. military said 30 militiamen were killed in the fighting, in which a U.S. Abrams tank was seriously damaged when it was hammered by rocket-propelled grenades. Officials from the party of radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, which heads the militia denied any of their fighters were killed.

Basically, the US is doing the SCIRI’s Badr Brigades’ job — slowly dismantling the Mahdi forces so it doesn’t have to. Don’t misunderstand, direct action against the Mahdi Army is required, but it would be helpful if all Iraqi militias were given the same sort of treatment. The main problem is that the SCIRI militia is embedded within Iraq’s institutions, including the powerful Department of the Interior, and therefore commits sectarian killings in the name of the state. The Mahdi Army, on the other hand, is forced to operate in the open and presents an easy target. While it seems the Mahdi Army’s place in the spotlight would be a hindrance, it actually feeds into the radical Shi’ite reverence for martyrdom and could potentially strengthen Sadr’s hand through further radicalization of the poverty stricken masses.

The article also suggests that Nouri al-Maliki is not actually interested in dismantling the militias, which is something I suggested back when he claimed otherwise directly after his election following months of Shi’ite in-fighting. Doing so would dismantle his own electoral bloc and lead to the Da’wa party’s total marginalization.

technorati tags:sadr, mahdi-army, sciri, iraq